Special Needs – reprised

There’s more to this story than  I realised.  Turns out  that we  in  New Zealand  have an Office for Disability Issues  within the Ministry of Social Development   and that this office has a New Zealand  Disability Strategy.  Part Three  of this strategy states that the  New Zealand  government will:

3.1 – Ensure that no child is denied access to their local, regular school because of their impairment.

and, 

3.3 – Ensure that teachers and other educators understand the learning needs of disabled people.

Which  is  why  IHC, in  2008,  took a complaint to the  Human  Rights Commission  “that Government policies and practices prevent disabled students participating fully at their local school.”

The IHC were  not impressed by the policy announced by Mr. Hide recently.

IHC director of advocacy Trish Grant said the review did not go far enough.

“There was a lot of hope pinned on this review that it would deal with those fundamental issues … but that hasn’t been achieved,” Ms Grant said. “The review still provides for a dual education system where there are special schools … It’s still kind of tweaking around the edges.”

Stuff

The reason  the IHC lodged its complaint  in  2008 is probably something  to do with this:

The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is the first human rights convention of the twenty first century.

New Zealand signed the Convention on 30 March, 2007 and ratified it 26 September, 2008.

Human  Rights Commission

And  in Article 24 of this Convention  we find:

Persons with disabilities are not excluded from the general education system on the basis of disability, and that children with disabilities are not excluded from free and compulsory primary education, or from secondary education, on the basis of disability.

Hmmm.

A  newspaper from  the 2008 tells us,

 People with disabilities do not want to be seen as “objects” of charity, or “victims” always in need of social protection, nor as “deserving” cases for medical treatment.

Instead they want to be seen through the same lens as everyone else. This means recognition that people with disabilities are citizens with rights, capable of claiming those rights and of making decisions about their lives based on free and informed consent as active members of society.

and carries on, optimistically,

An initial scan indicates that most of our legislation does comply and it is unlikely that there will need to make too many changes to New Zealand law.

And in truth, the Convention does not include any new rights for people with disabilities, but rather spells out the rights people with disabilities already possess alongside everyone else.

Scoop

Not  so.  If the Convention  states that children with disabilities need to be viewed in the same way as a child from  Somalia, or a child who is Jewish, or a child who is from  a poor background, or a child who speaks only Samoan, then of course that  child should be included in  our mainstream schools no questions asked.  And that is what  the Convention is saying, and the Convention is what we signed up for.  Actually we didn’t  just sign up,  as the Scoop article crows, we were  one of the driving  countries behind  this Convention.

Here’s where disability advocates  and the  government  really disagree though.  You might have noticed that what Trish Grant from  the  IHC really objected to in the latest policy announcement was the retention of a “dual” education system.  There are schools in  New Zealand that cater specifically to high  needs students.   Ms. Grant is advocating the  closure of these schools on the basis that students  with disabilities should be seen  as any other student in  New Zealand  and should simply attend a regular school.

This is a correct reading of the Convention.  However the  government, via Mr. Hide, stated that:

Parent’s should have the right to choose where their child goes to school.

Therefore, I’ll be keeping the special schools that provide support to children with very high needs, and encouraging them to provide more specialist out-reach teaching.

Beehive

 Right down  at the heart of this debate is the matter of what  the mainstream accepts as mainstream, and nice and cosy with that idea is how much people are willing to pay to be inclusive.

On my second placement in my teacher training year I was at an Intermediate that was adding an elevator to its two storey school block because they had a child attending who was in a wheel chair.  Students only attend Intermediate school for two years  and it was looking pretty likely that by the time the school had made its applications, got funding, had plans drawn up and actually had the elevator added the student who needed it would have moved on to college.  Of course when the next student with mobility issues goes to that Intermediate the school will be good to go, but at the time it was happening it looked a little wasteful.  But this is the actual nitty gritty of signing a Convention: highly specific building programmes in all the schools of New Zealand to cater to a miniority group with highly diverse needs.

To be honest I think that this is worthwhile, and these building programmes should be undertaken one by one as they come up – but I imagine it is a lot cheaper in tight financial times for the government to leave the special schools open and increase pressure on regular schools to do more (and skip the expense of training as well).

All of this makes me wonder how the most recent convention we signed up to (the rights of indigenous people, remember?) will come back to bite us in the ass. 

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Special Needs – reprised

  1. Anyone who thinks everyone should be mainstreamed needs to meet my brother. He’s 12, autistic, can’t talk, and is still in nappies.
    Sometimes special schools are necessary.

  2. Yep, I hear that… but, this is not what the IHC seem to be pushing for based on the Convention. I would like to know more about how the IHC see this working in what seems to be pretty unworkable cases, but it’s quite hard to find this out. Also, it seems to me that we already have “special schools” for students who just can’t behave themselves (activity centres), and other students with different needs are handled through the Correspondence School, so what is the beef with special schools?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s